And then on some of their explanation of what Abelard wrote on the universals.Abelard shows the possibility to talk about real things, and then universals describing them have.Abelard is a monk and a theologian, and not just a natural philosopher.Here we can note that Abelard’s answers are extremely sharp, flexible and inclusive.He concentrates on the different meanings in which the universals are applied and understood.It seems that Abelard’s solution was neither nominalistic, no realistic.We can trace Abelard’s logical ideas in Kant’s writings on logic.Statements of Broadie and Weinberg, which seemed to me contradicting my understanding of Abelard.Element of the Abelard’s doctrine.It is not just Weinberg who call’s Abelard’s solution a.